InfiniteMac OSx86  


Reply
 
Thread tools Display modes
  #651  
Old 05-01-2012, 06:05 PM
aaqib7 aaqib7 is offline
Cheetah
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by m28ew View Post
@aaqib7
felipeunix is running the osx on his AMD Bulldozer FX 8120 which supports the SSSE3 instructions
that's why he can run the 64-bits apps


@felipeunix
AFAIK (CMIIW) the -force64 has not been implemented in the legacy kernel yet
and since you have the FX series AMD, by default you're running the osx in the 64-bits mode (with / without arch=x86_64)


@ryman
I got same issues here
After several minutes, the annoying xpchelper crashes are still occurring, then most of apps refuse to run


@justinster123
Keep up the good work!
Your efforts are appreciated

Thanks for that
Reply With Quote
  #652  
Old 05-01-2012, 06:15 PM
R:A:W:X86's Avatar
R:A:W:X86 R:A:W:X86 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by felipeunix View Post
AMD FX-8120
...already thought that...

What you currently have, also works with the v3 Kernel by bronzovka...

For 32-Bit Apps, you can try to flip 5A 89 E1 0F 34 90 into 59 CD FC 51 C3 90 in dyld.
Be sure to give it +x permission before you copy it over.

With bronzovka Kernel this has resulted in a kernel panic - so if you try, be very sure to have a back-up & another way to access your HD to restore it.

I can not try this myself yet - the Kernel made by Justin needs some little fix applied to work on the two-module-bulldozers / doesn't work for me yet...

AMD FX 4100
MSI 760GM-P23
Radeon HD6570
OS X Lion Retail 10.7.5
Lion Kernel Project

Last edited by R:A:W:X86; 05-01-2012 at 06:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #653  
Old 05-01-2012, 06:20 PM
ryman ryman is offline
Puma
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 24
Can anybody boot with a Phenom CPU can woot with the 64bit kernel or is it just for Bulldozer?
Reply With Quote
  #654  
Old 05-01-2012, 10:01 PM
justinster123 justinster123 is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaqib7 View Post
I have the same audio card 'alc662' but i havent configured it yet for Lion.
You could try this: http://www.osx86.net/downloads.php?do=file&id=1629 - because I think it supports 'alc662' for lion.
Thanks for your reply, I'm pretty sure I tried that, but not sure
Reply With Quote
  #655  
Old 05-01-2012, 10:02 PM
justinster123 justinster123 is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by R:A:W:X86 View Post
...already thought that...

What you currently have, also works with the v3 Kernel by bronzovka...

For 32-Bit Apps, you can try to flip 5A 89 E1 0F 34 90 into 59 CD FC 51 C3 90 in dyld.
Be sure to give it +x permission before you copy it over.

With bronzovka Kernel this has resulted in a kernel panic - so if you try, be very sure to have a back-up & another way to access your HD to restore it.

I can not try this myself yet - the Kernel made by Justin needs some little fix applied to work on the two-module-bulldozers / doesn't work for me yet...
I'm home from school,
ugh grade 12 classes no spares...... (free periods)
ok I'm going to try and apply that fix for you
the panic to printf and upload the universal kernel.
wow I'm shocked at the results I never would've expected it to work good. but hey
Reply With Quote
  #656  
Old 05-01-2012, 10:07 PM
justinster123 justinster123 is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaqib7 View Post
Thanks but im still unable to boot in 64bit mode using -force64? It only boots using -legacy?
Using -legacy - all 32 bit apps work and 64bit apps but after 10min the 64bit apps crash and dont work but the 32 bit apps work fine.
If I boot using -force64 - it doesnt boot to Lion. Thanks for your help mate.
You NEED to have an amd cpu with SSSE3 instructions
IE Bulldozer, FX

maybe your confused with amd SSE3, no good for lion, requires SSSE3
if not, the system hangs with -force64 just before where launchd would say it's started up
launchd refuses to launch on my processor 64-bit
Reply With Quote
  #657  
Old 05-01-2012, 10:17 PM
justinster123 justinster123 is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 43
@All try this one
specifically I applied the patch for R:A:W:X86
Please test
only fix I applied should be for pure 64-bit panic on some bulldozer, I'll look later,
g2g do chores -__-
and homework

http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?uyg3j8yuxgdx39z
Reply With Quote
  #658  
Old 05-01-2012, 11:05 PM
felipeunix felipeunix is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by justinster123 View Post
@All try this one
specifically I applied the patch for R:A:W:X86
Please test
only fix I applied should be for pure 64-bit panic on some bulldozer, I'll look later,
g2g do chores -__-
and homework

http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?uyg3j8yuxgdx39z
Here's my results:

Now I needed to add a flag "arch = i386" to be able to start.

1 - with "arch = i386" + "-legacy" ... obviously everything started in 32-bit .. but not frozen no apps .. a + this time - 45 minutes
only the finder you need to use the patch
apparently super stable.


2 - with "arch = i386" + "-force64" ... obviously already started with all 64-bit apps .. SUPER fast boot!
agility in any task.
finder does not need to patch.
But the 32-bit apps do not open.
Reply With Quote
  #659  
Old 05-02-2012, 01:21 AM
felipeunix felipeunix is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 45
some more tests and was able to prove the following:

with the original finder:

x64 - system slowdown, 32-bit apps will not open
x32 - does not open, but does not freeze applications!

with patch finder:

x64 - slowly resolved!!! 32-bit apps will not open
x32 - opens but freezes the application again ..


I'm using x64 and patch finder, I get no 32-bit apps, but with the system very quickly and without crashes ^^

thanks for the support, I am available for whatever you need me!

Last edited by felipeunix; 05-02-2012 at 01:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #660  
Old 05-02-2012, 09:50 AM
ghostec ghostec is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41
Hey guys,

I just saw that qemu can emulate a processor type, something that vmware/virtualbox can't.
Anyone have already tried to use it to run OSX in a AMD box? (emulating a Intel processor, if it can).



💡 Deploy cloud instances seamlessly on DigitalOcean. Free credits ($100) for InfMac readers.

Reply With Quote
Reply