Lion with AMD - Page 23

Unrealized · #**221** 04-03-2012, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PookyMacMan

Gee, I'm not that serious about it...it's just normal protocol to release source. All kernel devs have done that in the past...

I'm also thankful for all the work done.

That's it.

akimoa · #**222** 04-03-2012, 05:18 PM

and so did he ....atleast to some people he just doesnt want the wrong peeps trolling with his work wich is perfectly understandable im pretty shure that the ones wich are compatible working on it have a source from him otherwise we get idiots like on nawcoms website trolling with wrong devloper names and virus sites to get attention ->http://blog.nawcom.com/?p=908#comment-2485

larrougos · #**223** 04-03-2012, 05:33 PM

----ing idiots!!!sry for bad words but i saw that and a huge smile came to my face!!!BUT...as u said some guys are trolling so much!!!FOR NO REASON!!!IDIOTS!!!

Unrealized · #**224** 04-03-2012, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by larrougos

----ing idiots!!!sry for bad words but i saw that and a huge smile came to my face!!!BUT...as u said some guys are trolling so much!!!FOR NO REASON!!!IDIOTS!!!

I agree. People are just plain stupid. We should all just unite and get the work done. Instead of trolling.

R:A:W:X86 · #**225** 04-03-2012, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PookyMacMan

Gee, I'm not that serious about it...it's just normal protocol to release source. All kernel devs have done that in the past...

Well I am into this since the early days of Leopard and this wasn't not usual in the beginning.
The source code of the ToH Kernel patch was made public end of May 2008.
More than half a year after the beginning of it's development.

It has proved that this had been the right decission.
If the source would not have been released back then, the development of the Voodoo Kernel would have never been achieved and AMD OSx86 would be already dead for a long time now...

But still I do understand him.
If I would have put a lot of work in to a Kernel patch, I would not want some tonymac like asshole to relabel it without giving any credits either.

Nevertheless I hope my argumentation will be heared...

Quote:

Originally Posted by akimoa

and so did he ...

Good to hear someone has it.
My FX-4100 is on it's way and my Phenom II just been put for sale on eBay.

I am pretty sure to get it fully working.

Would be to bad if some nasty Kernel depencies would end this with the release of some future system update...

akimoa · #**226** 04-03-2012, 06:44 PM

Quote:

If I would have put a lot of work in to a Kernel patch, I would not want some tonymac like asshole to relabel it without giving any credits either.

Nevertheless I hope my argumentation will be heared...

made me smile ..100% agree

Unrealized · #**227** 04-03-2012, 06:51 PM

I get instant reboot. Model 5.

PookyMacMan · #**228** 04-03-2012, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by akimoa

and so did he ....atleast to some people he just doesnt want the wrong peeps trolling with his work wich is perfectly understandable im pretty shure that the ones wich are compatible working on it have a source from him otherwise we get idiots like on nawcoms website trolling with wrong devloper names and virus sites to get attention ->http://blog.nawcom.com/?p=908#comment-2485

I can totally understand...no tonycrap people are needed to take credit for work they didn't do!!

PookyMacMan · #**229** 04-03-2012, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unrealized

I agree. People are just plain stupid. We should all just unite and get the work done. Instead of trolling.

Agreed!!!!

pma61 · #**230** 04-03-2012, 07:14 PM

I tried the v3 mach_kernel... More apps are working now such Activity monitor, but finder & Co. have the same problem