InfiniteMac OSx86  


Reply
 
Thread tools Display modes
  #71  
Old 02-09-2011, 09:38 AM
wastez's Avatar
wastez wastez is offline
Panther
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 182
I tried this kernel ones more but nothing changed, the most software did not work with it......
Do iīve to insert the std_dyld=yes into the boot.plist or is it anough to write it as kernel flag during the boot up?

Greetz
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 02-09-2011, 02:54 PM
chitchit chitchit is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Someone with a sse2 only cpu, please try this! I want to make sure that someone else gets my error!

And Wastez, as long as you enter it correctly, entering it in the com.boot.apple.plist is the same as adding it while booting, just that when you boot, you have to type it every time.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 02-09-2011, 04:31 PM
wastez's Avatar
wastez wastez is offline
Panther
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 182
@ bkribbs

Itīs not exactly the same because when i enter it by the bootup it insert it in kernel flags.
The other way is to enter it as several point in boot.plist.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 02-17-2011, 09:45 AM
wastez's Avatar
wastez wastez is offline
Panther
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 182
@ andy

Whatīs going on with the kernel?
Will there come a new version and what about the dyld is it still in beta?
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 02-17-2011, 01:49 PM
wastez's Avatar
wastez wastez is offline
Panther
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 182
Can anyone tell me why my AMD- System get slower with x86_64 then i386 -force64?

Would be really interessting why......
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 02-17-2011, 02:15 PM
chitchit chitchit is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by wastez View Post
Can anyone tell me why my AMD- System get slower with x86_64 then i386 -force64?

Would be really interessting why......
He's still working on it. And the first one is running it in 64-bit mode, while the second is 32 bit, while forcing some applications to use 64 bi mode.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 02-17-2011, 03:01 PM
wastez's Avatar
wastez wastez is offline
Panther
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkribbs View Post
He's still working on it. And the first one is running it in 64-bit mode, while the second is 32 bit, while forcing some applications to use 64 bi mode.
Which one is 64 Bit?

And thx for the info....
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 02-18-2011, 01:37 AM
chitchit chitchit is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Now I could be wrong with all that. But I believe that x86_64 is 64 bit
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 02-19-2011, 05:44 PM
andyvand's Avatar
andyvand andyvand is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tienen
Posts: 515
Quote:
Originally Posted by wastez View Post
@ andy

Whatīs going on with the kernel?
Will there come a new version and what about the dyld is it still in beta?
Yes it is still beta (but improved so far).
The unwind code is what makes some apps not work without using UPX to pack it.
I'm trying to adapt the code to make it work better...
I'll continue my research...
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 02-20-2011, 03:12 AM
davisin666 davisin666 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 98
Thanks Andy for your work!



💡 Deploy cloud instances seamlessly on DigitalOcean. Free credits ($100) for InfMac readers.


System
  • MoBo: MSI K9N2GM-FD, Chipset GeForce 8200 (MCP78)
  • CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ @3,02 Ghz
  • RAM: Kingston 2GB DDR2 800Mhz + Corsair 2GB DDR2 800Mhz @747Mhz
  • VGA: EVGA 9800GT SSC
  • HDD: 300GB WD SATAII
  • Optical Drive: Sony SATA 24X
  • OS: Vanilla Mac OS X Server 10.6.0 + Nawcom ModCD, upgraded to 10.6.8 and Windows 7 x64.
Everything works, except sleep, so system isn't Energy Star compilant .
Reply With Quote
Reply