InfiniteMac OSx86
Page 2 of 8 < 1 2 34 > Last »
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

InfiniteMac OSx86 (http://infinitemac.com/forum.php)
-   10.X (http://infinitemac.com/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   Legacy kernel 10.7.0 with custom dyld (now also with atom patch) (http://infinitemac.com/showthread.php?t=7098)

akimoa 04-13-2011 08:11 AM
Get the UPX file from Andys other thread and put him where he belongs after open Terminal and put this

Code:
upx --force /System/Library/CoreServices/pbs
And yes kernel works for AMD

odin1937 04-13-2011 08:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by akimoa (Post 53645)
Get the UPX file from Andys other thread and put him where he belongs after open Terminal and put this

Code:
upx --force /System/Library/CoreServices/pbs
And yes kernel works for AMD
I believe you mean this thread:
Code:
http://osx86.co/f36/10-6-6-legacy-kernel-for-intel-amd-t6892/
.

thank you for the upx command! :D

wastez 04-13-2011 08:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by akimoa (Post 53643)
For some reason me and custom dyld willl never get friends to much programms are not responding and i wont upx them all so no use for me
Last time (10.6.6) i had the same problem but this time almost all works without upx.

odin1937 04-13-2011 08:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wastez (Post 53647)
Last time (10.6.6) i had the same problem but this time almost all works without upx.
bro , I see from your signature that you use AnVAL Bootloader 5.1.4. Since you have AMD Athlon 64 X2 , do you find anval better for amd than chameleon latest releases? My cpu is amd opteron 185.

wastez 04-13-2011 09:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by odin1937 (Post 53648)
bro , I see from your signature that you use AnVAL Bootloader 5.1.4. Since you have AMD Athlon 64 X2 , do you find anval better for amd than chameleon latest releases? My cpu is amd opteron 185.
In the moment i would use anval for amd. I tried almost every bootloader and this one works at best.
Just try it and you will have no regrets about.

odin1937 04-13-2011 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wastez (Post 53649)
In the moment i would use anval for amd. I tried almost every bootloader and this one works at best.
Just try it and you will have no regrets about.
thanks for the tip! ;)

andyvand 04-13-2011 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by odin1937 (Post 53644)
thanks for the share. I assume that this kernel runs also on amd machines? I am asking cause I am running snow 10.6.7 on amd opteron 185 X2 and nforce4 chipset. :D

Also , any info , how we can pack pbs wih upx , patch it for 32bit mode?:-d
No, use my custom upx and pack it (or any other upx).
E.G. upx -9 /System/Library/CoreServices/pbs

odin1937 04-13-2011 09:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyvand (Post 53651)
No, use my custom upx and pack it (or any other upx).
E.G. upx -9 /System/Library/CoreServices/pbs
ok thanks , I have decrypted and patched binaries with marvin's amd utility and some amd_insn_patcher , so things should be smooth with upx.

thanks mate!

odin1937 04-13-2011 03:15 PM
I installed the kernel , packed pbs with upx , but during boot I have the : patch_text_segment failed.

When I got online , I saw that nothing from the important stuff was crashing such as finder , disk uitlity , rest utilities , system preferences e.t.c , only safari , seamonkey and radium.

I managed to fix safari with upx , but not seamonkey and radium. Seamonkey had encrypted binaries which have been fixed with marvin's utility.

So i am booting with std_dyld=Yes with no problems.

wastez 04-14-2011 07:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by odin1937 (Post 53654)
I installed the kernel , packed pbs with upx , but during boot I have the : patch_text_segment failed.

When I got online , I saw that nothing from the important stuff was crashing such as finder , disk uitlity , rest utilities , system preferences e.t.c , only safari , seamonkey and radium.

I managed to fix safari with upx , but not seamonkey and radium. Seamonkey had encrypted binaries which have been fixed with marvin's utility.

So i am booting with std_dyld=Yes with no problems.
Thatīs clear because if you use std_kernel=Yes you donīt use the custom dyld which is implemented into the kernel. ;) If you use this kernel flag the kernel differs not to the nawcom kernel.