9.1.0 & 9.2.0 Kernels (Which one to install?)
I would like to clarify something. Is it true that users that installed 10.5.2 Zephyroth Release were required to install both 9.1.0 and 9.2.0 Kernels before proceeding to the installation? What if I only installed 9.2.0 Kernal and not the…
- Primary Author
- @WinLinMac01 Published 2008-02-19
- Collection
- Leopard 10.5
- Archival Footprint
- 4,900 historical reads · 9 curated field notes (from 17 dispatches) · 2008-02-19 – 2008-03-05
- Credited Voices (7)
- @WinLinMac01 (7)@rumar4u (3)@art (2)@eMatoS (2)@zephyroth@gipo@zuz242
I would like to clarify something. Is it true that users that installed 10.5.2 Zephyroth Release were required to install both 9.1.0 and 9.2.0 Kernels before proceeding to the installation? What if I only installed 9.2.0 Kernal and not the 9.1.0? Is there a downside? Is there a benefit if I choose to install both Kernels?
- Thanks
Author Updates & Technical Revisions
Follow-up dispatches by @WinLinMac01
Thanks, So I should have installed both kernels right? Is it suggested that I install both Kernals?
[cite] rumar4u:In my personal Experience the new 10.5.2 update worked with 2 files differently 1- Mach_Kernel 9.2 without the "NEW" dsmos.kext 2-old dsmos.kext from 10.5.1 Hope it helps
lol, I did that for my booting problem, experienced and helped others, feel happy. I just hope it doesn't cause any problems. Do you know how to verify what kernal you are using? I think thats all I need to know.
[cite] rumar4u:My friend just mess around with it so you can learn up a bit and help others in a future, try to do what i just told you and you'll be up and running. HOW ? just follow your heart
Thanx. Thats the best way to determine. =)
[cite] rumar4u:When the system boots, QUICKLY check in the upper side that it will tell you 9.2 by ToH (something similar) thats in 1 maybe 2 seconds span
what? lol
[cite] art:Hmm... I dont install neither of them. And all work nice.
I tried ticking both kernals, system did not work. You only tick one as others have said. =) oh, and I tried this when Zephyroth first released his last DVD.
Synthesized Community Field Notes
9 technical responses curated from 17 original dispatches
In my personal Experience the new 10.5.2 update worked with 2 files differently
1- Mach_Kernel 9.2 without the "NEW" dsmos.kext
2-old dsmos.kext from 10.5.1
Hope it helps
My friend just mess around with it so you can learn up a bit and help others in a future, try to do what i just told you and you'll be up and running. HOW ? just follow your heart
When the system boots, QUICKLY check in the upper side that it will tell you 9.2 by ToH (something similar) thats in 1 maybe 2 seconds span
Hmm... I dont install neither of them. And all work nice.
[cite] eMatoS:how's that art?
Dont know exactly. Maybe installer copy some of them by default. Anyway I can post any information about system. Its working fine on my home PC now.
[cite] WinLinMac01:what? lol
Please read top.
In fact when you don't select Kernel-9.1.0 and Kernel-9.2.0 the kernel installed is 9.0.0 ... Very simple no ?
Hehehe, never thought it was an option, maybe you can add this detail to the description into the next release or patch.
But it's necessary, if you wish to select Kernel-9.2.0, tick Kernel-9.1.0 as well or not?
i don´t think so. u can only use one kernel at a time, can´t you?
so u just tick 9.2.0.
Sources & Contributor Provenance (7 credited usernames · Thread #353)
| Username | Dossier Contribution | Dispatches | Active Window |
|---|---|---|---|
| @WinLinMac01 | Primary Author | 7 | 2008-02-19 → 2008-03-05 |
| @rumar4u | Core Contributor | 3 | 2008-02-19 |
| @art | Contributor | 2 | 2008-03-03 → 2008-03-04 |
| @eMatoS | Contributor | 2 | 2008-03-04 |
| @zephyroth | Contributor | 1 | 2008-03-04 |
| @gipo | Contributor | 1 | 2008-03-04 |
| @zuz242 | Contributor | 1 | 2008-03-05 |