First screenshot of Chrome on OS X
Looks like the UI will translate well after all, hope to see more soon : Detailed status on the mac build can be found here
- Primary Author
- @Voyn1x Published 2009-02-13
- Collection
- Software, Drivers & Kexts
- Archival Footprint
- 7,013 historical reads · 8 curated field notes (from 11 dispatches) · 2009-02-13 – 2009-05-31
- Credited Voices (7)
- @Taisto (2)@MoC (2)@cmdshft (2)@naquaada (2)@Voyn1x@maya77@lunfai
Looks like the UI will translate well after all, hope to see more soon :
Detailed status on the mac build can be found here (dev.chro mium.org/developers/how-tos/mac-detailed-status)
Synthesized Community Field Notes
8 technical responses curated from 11 original dispatches
Looks nice, but i guess it gets nicer look on Windows Aero. I Wonder if it`ll be better than Safari when it`s finally out
It doesn't look bad. In my opinion, nothing can beat Firefox, but we said the same thing for Firefox when everybody was using IE and Netscape. Only time will tell, It doesn't look bad though..
My favourite browser is Flock (fl ock.com/).
Here's another pic of Chrome for Mac.
@Hara TaikiYou must mean Safari.
Safari's only good on the Mac, they tried to port it to Windows and failed miserably. If you'd do web development you'd know that Firefox is the way to go :
@MoCSafari's only good on the Mac, they tried to port it to Windows and failed miserably. If you'd do web development you'd know that Firefox is the way to go :
Oh, well since this a Mac community and not Windows, I thought Safari would be king (it is in terms of speed and rendering capability [ACID3: 75/100 vs 45/100 for Firefox]).
But yes, on Windows, Firefox is king.
MoC: If you like Firefox, try Flock. It's based on Firefox, but has a lot of additional functions, including a great media search bar and flickr uploader. I never liked Firefox so much (especcially version 3), but Flock was different. It also seems to be faster than Firefox 3 although it's using the same engine.
@Hara TaikiOh, well since this a Mac community and not Windows, I thought Safari would be king (it is in terms of speed and rendering capability [ACID3: 75/100 vs 45/100 for Firefox]). But yes, on Windows, Firefox is king.
Safari wouldn't even be close to being the king on Safari since Opera's speed and rendering difies web standards with Acid 3 : 100/100.
@lunfaiSafari wouldn't even be close to being the king on Safari since Opera's speed and rendering difies web standards with Acid 3 : 100/100.
Old version of Opera was far below that, and new Safari - even in beta gets 100/100 as well Still, i guess it's not the Acid which counts the most. I dont like Opera's interface, and as for me it's the most important thing Maybe that's not really smart, but i can wait for browser to render page slower, but i can't stand the interface which which i personally don't find easy to use.
Sources & Contributor Provenance (7 credited usernames · Thread #2124)
| Username | Dossier Contribution | Dispatches | Active Window |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Taisto | Contributor | 2 | 2009-02-13 → 2009-05-31 |
| @MoC | Contributor | 2 | 2009-02-17 → 2009-02-19 |
| @cmdshft | Contributor | 2 | 2009-02-18 → 2009-02-19 |
| @naquaada | Contributor | 2 | 2009-02-18 → 2009-02-19 |
| @Voyn1x | Primary Author | 1 | 2009-02-13 |
| @maya77 | Contributor | 1 | 2009-02-17 |
| @lunfai | Contributor | 1 | 2009-05-31 |