Mac OS X on x86 Hardware 2008–2024 Technical Archive
InfiniteMac OSx86 › Leopard 10.5 › Installing & patching 10.5 flat img
5,100 reads · 2009-01-23 – 2009-01-24
Report Leopard 10.5 AMD OSx86

Installing & patching 10.5 flat img

i just got a copy of Leopard 10.5 flat image and im confused as to weither it can only run on SSE2 Intel CPUs or both Intel and AMD. if not is there a way to patch the kernel to work with AMD. btw my CPU is an AMD Turion 64 x2 TL-62 and…

Primary Author
@samurai_47 Published 2009-01-23
Collection
Leopard 10.5
Archival Footprint
5,100 historical reads · 9 curated field notes (from 15 dispatches) · 2009-01-23 – 2009-01-24
Credited Voices (3)
@cmdshft (7)@samurai_47 (4)@nfoav8or (4)

i just got a copy of Leopard 10.5 flat image and im confused as to weither it can only run on SSE2 Intel CPUs or both Intel and AMD. if not is there a way to patch the kernel to work with AMD. btw my CPU is an AMD Turion 64 x2 TL-62 and supports SSE, SSE2, & SSE3. I dont need help installing the image just wondering if itll run on my CPU, so no lengthy guides, thanks.

samurai_47

Author Updates & Technical Revisions

Follow-up dispatches by @samurai_47

Author Update #1 @samurai_47 2009-01-23

hmmm i would but every DVD ive tried fails to find my HDD on both my desktop and laptop.

Author Update #2 @samurai_47 2009-01-23

yeah sir, that doesnt work either. i have a generic AMD OS 10.5.1, LawlessPPC Phenon & AMD 10.5, and OSX86 Beta.

Anyways... back to my original question… would i be able to patch the flat image to run on AMD and nforce/nvidia?

Author Update #3 @samurai_47 2009-01-24

oh well, ill try anyways just to see what i get. somethings better than nothing.im installing on a USB HDD anyways i can always just reformat.. thanks for info though.

Synthesized Community Field Notes

9 technical responses curated from 15 original dispatches

Field Note #1 @cmdshft 2009-01-23

Get out of the stoneage and use a real installer DVD.

Field Note #2 @nfoav8or 2009-01-24

well technically... yes.

You can use TransMac to access this drive from within windows and also to place it on the hard drive in the first place. You can then manipulate the drive to fix the OS to work with your system.

I do agree with Hara Taiki in that you may not get it running with your system if you aren't able to install it from any of the distros out there for OSx86, but I think you can at least tinker with the flat installed image through Transmac.

Field Note #3 @cmdshft 2009-01-24

It's a lot harder with Transmac or MacDrive, because if the OS X drive panics, you have to force restart, which doesn't properly sync the drive, forcing you to reboot that drive first before doing mods through Windows, otherwise in Windows it will whine about corruption. And if it panics before you can get into -s, then it's even worse.

Field Note #4 @nfoav8or 2009-01-24

you use Transmac from within Windows to manipulate the drive when running windows but you aren't using Transmac to RUN OSx86... you restart the computer after the manipulation so you don't have to worry about corruption through Windows.

Field Note #5 @cmdshft 2009-01-24 ↳ Re: @nfoav8or
@nfoav8oryou use Transmac from within Windows to manipulate the drive when running windows but you aren't using Transmac to RUN OSx86... you restart the computer after the manipulation so you don't have to worry about corruption through Windows.

I think you misread. I know you're not using it to boot OS X. The problem is when you have OS X booted and it panics or doesn't get to a point where you can avoid a hard reboot. You wont be able to make changes through Transmac in Windows because the OS X disk never synchs properly when you hard reset from a panic or incomplete boot due to an error.

Field Note #6 @nfoav8or 2009-01-24

ah, I see what you are saying now…

well this is a chance you have to be willing to take if the proper steps are taken to ensure no kernel panic. This is pretty simple when you consider it doesn't take too much to research the needed files for hardware these days.

Field Note #7 @cmdshft 2009-01-24

Now that I think about it, is the turon proc even supported by Voodoo?

Field Note #8 @nfoav8or 2009-01-24

hmmm. yes, you're right. in the documentation the Turon processor is not listed as being one that was tested to work. My bad.

Field Note #9 @cmdshft 2009-01-24

Yeah, I don't think the Turon is supported by any distro, strictly because the kernels don't support it. Not much can be done other than trying to contact the Voodoo/Chameleon team and coax them into supporting the Turon in the upcoming 9.6.0 kernel.

Corroborated & Participated: @cmdshft
Sources & Contributor Provenance (3 credited usernames · Thread #2002)
UsernameDossier ContributionDispatchesActive Window
@cmdshftCore Contributor72009-01-23 → 2009-01-24
@samurai_47Primary Author42009-01-23 → 2009-01-24
@nfoav8orCore Contributor42009-01-24