InfiniteMac OSx86  


Reply
 
Thread tools Display modes
  #681  
Old 05-05-2012, 07:50 PM
lunfai lunfai is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 95
Some of you sound ungrateful for anything. Just wait, he's not getting paid to do anything of this, and Dimitri isn't too, so stop sounding like spoilt children. If any of you was so keen to develop a fully working kernel with the source that's already provided in this thread, so work with that or just wait.
Reply With Quote
  #682  
Old 05-05-2012, 08:07 PM
rhcp011235 rhcp011235 is offline
Cheetah
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by lunfai View Post
Some of you sound ungrateful for anything. Just wait, he's not getting paid to do anything of this, and Dimitri isn't too, so stop sounding like spoilt children. If any of you was so keen to develop a fully working kernel with the source that's already provided in this thread, so work with that or just wait.
It's got nothing to do with getting paid. This is highly un-org. 60 pages of nothing.

no patch files. which take 3 seconds diff A X

if it was on GIT/SVN we could all work on it. instead of 1 person posting things. again with no source which is not GNU policy.
Reply With Quote
  #683  
Old 05-05-2012, 08:41 PM
justinster123 justinster123 is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by lunfai View Post
Some of you sound ungrateful for anything. Just wait, he's not getting paid to do anything of this, and Dimitri isn't too, so stop sounding like spoilt children. If any of you was so keen to develop a fully working kernel with the source that's already provided in this thread, so work with that or just wait.
If only this site had a "Like" or "Retweet" button :')
Reply With Quote
  #684  
Old 05-05-2012, 10:04 PM
lunfai lunfai is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhcp011235 View Post
It's got nothing to do with getting paid. This is highly un-org. 60 pages of nothing.

no patch files. which take 3 seconds diff A X

if it was on GIT/SVN we could all work on it. instead of 1 person posting things. again with no source which is not GNU policy.
http://osx86.co/f100/lion-with-amd-t7106/post56743.html

Here's the link to the v3 source. Instead of complaining go ahead and woe us. It might be under the GNU policy, but serious are you really going to sue him for not releasing? This is a forum, it's a discussion board, of course there's going to be a lot of posts that might not be of your taste, and it's not about getting paid, it's about the TIME AND EFFORT they put into developing the kernel. All the time and effort you've contributed is whining.

Seriously, now pick up your dummy.
Reply With Quote
  #685  
Old 05-06-2012, 01:42 AM
davisin666 davisin666 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 98
Looks like we will need to create a new branch of the kernel, and upload it to a version control system like git/svn.

BTW I'm selling my AMB MB/CPU in order to buy at least a 775 socket MB/CPU.
Nawcom is going to work in a kernel for AMD cpus, but I guess it will only work on Bulldozer processors.

http://blog.nawcom.com/?p=941

System
  • MoBo: MSI K9N2GM-FD, Chipset GeForce 8200 (MCP78)
  • CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ @3,02 Ghz
  • RAM: Kingston 2GB DDR2 800Mhz + Corsair 2GB DDR2 800Mhz @747Mhz
  • VGA: EVGA 9800GT SSC
  • HDD: 300GB WD SATAII
  • Optical Drive: Sony SATA 24X
  • OS: Vanilla Mac OS X Server 10.6.0 + Nawcom ModCD, upgraded to 10.6.8 and Windows 7 x64.
Everything works, except sleep, so system isn't Energy Star compilant .
Reply With Quote
  #686  
Old 05-06-2012, 02:46 AM
lunfai lunfai is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by davisin666 View Post
Looks like we will need to create a new branch of the kernel, and upload it to a version control system like git/svn.

BTW I'm selling my AMB MB/CPU in order to buy at least a 775 socket MB/CPU.
Nawcom is going to work in a kernel for AMD cpus, but I guess it will only work on Bulldozer processors.

http://blog.nawcom.com/?p=941
I got myself a 1155 socket MB (P8H61-L ME/USB3) for 60 dollars, real cheap. Supports Ivy bridge too. Running Mountain Lion D3 on it right now. ^^
Reply With Quote
  #687  
Old 05-06-2012, 06:43 PM
felipeunix felipeunix is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 45
I think the Nawcom will only work with the Mountain Lion.

Perhaps we should stick with the Snow Leopard for a long time ..
Reply With Quote
  #688  
Old 05-06-2012, 07:43 PM
ryman ryman is offline
Puma
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by lunfai View Post
Bronzovka GURU has released a statement that he has created a new version of the kernel that does not hang standard applications! More information tomorrow.
Any news about that?
Reply With Quote
  #689  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:08 PM
rhcp011235 rhcp011235 is offline
Cheetah
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by lunfai View Post
http://osx86.co/f100/lion-with-amd-t7106/post56743.html

Here's the link to the v3 source. Instead of complaining go ahead and woe us. It might be under the GNU policy, but serious are you really going to sue him for not releasing? This is a forum, it's a discussion board, of course there's going to be a lot of posts that might not be of your taste, and it's not about getting paid, it's about the TIME AND EFFORT they put into developing the kernel. All the time and effort you've contributed is whining.

Seriously, now pick up your dummy.
That's one patch which was made. all its doing is blocking out panics. what has been done since then? as the other people have said. branch of kernel and patches put up.

This all non-sense here is getting us no where. and yes nawcom is working on some stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #690  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:39 PM
lunfai lunfai is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryman View Post
Any news about that?
There's something wrong with the software update, but standard applications work. He's currently trying to fix this and trying to work out the encryption method in Lion.



💡 Deploy cloud instances seamlessly on DigitalOcean. Free credits ($100) for InfMac readers.

Reply With Quote
Reply