Quote:
Originally Posted by andyvand
First of all last release is more than proper...
The technical questions about my port?
Ask away... I've never seen any message directed at me with any questions nor have I ever received a mail stating any q's about it...
|
Quote:
I've never even noticed the posts... how could I have replied then?
If I click that link I do not even get a request or anything...
Just the main page and page 3 selected below...
|
If you let the post I linked to finish loading, you'll see it, and actually the are questions asked in that same page, and you ignored them, questions about adding HPET back (no proper answer from you), I even asked you about the "proper" Apple ID you added to Chameleon 1.0.11 (I've not seen anything in the first sources you released as 1.0.12 that is worthy of adding your copyright). which made many people who understand what programming is think of it as re-tagging.
Quote:
|
My point is not a "beat to the puch" attitude... it is to make something better with more features...
|
Since you like the proper way of things, there is a proper way of expressing your point, but it happens that people reveal what they really think and have inside.
Quote:
|
And it is my thought that fixing warnings up and perfecting code will result in a faster and better product (I've seen this proven many times...) also I find it important to use the latest toolset and some updated libraries from the kernel...
|
I agree that fixing and perfecting code is wanted, but anyone who knows the basics of coding will agree that in many (not all), of what you've released, lacks any real improvements, and I have yet to see a real proof of that, and what you claim to be faster.
Quote:
|
Next the IOPCIFamily and IOUSBFamily releases are slightly different from the others and in case of the IOUSBFamily parts it does state for PCGenUSBEHCI the proper copyrights (me and the other author...)
|
I've checked some of the first mods you posted for IOPCIFamily, maybe that was your first "work", I was disappointed.
And what shows that you usually have no idea what you're doing is something like
this; (quoting you):
Quote:
|
I could also do that mod of the sources for you... if you send or PM me the patches...
|
If you did modify the sources and know what you did, you wouldn't ask for patches, because you already have them, /dang
Quote:
|
You are wrong stating that I don't want to join a group of people and you are wrong stating that I don't allready work togheter with some...
|
It's an assumption anyone would make, because all your releases don't mention that you've worked with others, and don't tell about any group.
It's just your regular way of releasing;
NEW (lack of info..) works a lot better (no info..)
Enjoy (a smiley showing confidence)
Edit: fixed more issue (no idea what..)
You get asked each time what's new, what improvements does it bring, and then there is the usual kind of replies;
fixed warnings, perfecting the code, proper Apple IDs, and then something that may look useful (but unfortunately, not after checking the code...)
You, now, need to do much more to get your stuff working with this solution..
Quote:
|
But I don't want there to be any further future misunderstandings between us though...
|
I think there is big misunderstanding from your side, specially what happened with VPS2 (you didn't comment about it)
Quote:
|
Star Trek: These are romulans... They are without honour
|
Is there anything to misunderstand from that?
And I have to say that you can do better than this.