InfiniteMac OSx86

InfiniteMac OSx86 (http://infinitemac.com/forum.php)
-   Lion 10.7 (http://infinitemac.com/forumdisplay.php?f=100)
-   -   Lion with AMD (http://infinitemac.com/showthread.php?t=7106)

aaqib7 05-01-2012 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m28ew (Post 57346)
@aaqib7
felipeunix is running the osx on his AMD Bulldozer FX 8120 which supports the SSSE3 instructions
that's why he can run the 64-bits apps


@felipeunix
AFAIK (CMIIW) the -force64 has not been implemented in the legacy kernel yet
and since you have the FX series AMD, by default you're running the osx in the 64-bits mode (with / without arch=x86_64)


@ryman
I got same issues here
After several minutes, the annoying xpchelper crashes are still occurring, then most of apps refuse to run :'(


@justinster123
Keep up the good work! (Y)
Your efforts are appreciated :)


Thanks for that :)

R:A:W:X86 05-01-2012 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by felipeunix (Post 57347)
AMD FX-8120

...already thought that...

What you currently have, also works with the v3 Kernel by bronzovka...

For 32-Bit Apps, you can try to flip 5A 89 E1 0F 34 90 into 59 CD FC 51 C3 90 in dyld.
Be sure to give it +x permission before you copy it over.

With bronzovka Kernel this has resulted in a kernel panic - so if you try, be very sure to have a back-up & another way to access your HD to restore it.

I can not try this myself yet - the Kernel made by Justin needs some little fix applied to work on the two-module-bulldozers / doesn't work for me yet...

ryman 05-01-2012 06:20 PM

Can anybody boot with a Phenom CPU can woot with the 64bit kernel or is it just for Bulldozer?

justinster123 05-01-2012 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aaqib7 (Post 57335)
I have the same audio card 'alc662' but i havent configured it yet for Lion.
You could try this: http://www.osx86.net/downloads.php?do=file&id=1629 - because I think it supports 'alc662' for lion.

Thanks for your reply, I'm pretty sure I tried that, but not sure

justinster123 05-01-2012 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R:A:W:X86 (Post 57349)
...already thought that...

What you currently have, also works with the v3 Kernel by bronzovka...

For 32-Bit Apps, you can try to flip 5A 89 E1 0F 34 90 into 59 CD FC 51 C3 90 in dyld.
Be sure to give it +x permission before you copy it over.

With bronzovka Kernel this has resulted in a kernel panic - so if you try, be very sure to have a back-up & another way to access your HD to restore it.

I can not try this myself yet - the Kernel made by Justin needs some little fix applied to work on the two-module-bulldozers / doesn't work for me yet...

I'm home from school,
ugh grade 12 classes no spares...... (free periods)
ok I'm going to try and apply that fix for you :)
the panic to printf and upload the universal kernel.
wow I'm shocked at the results I never would've expected it to work good. but hey :)

justinster123 05-01-2012 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aaqib7 (Post 57341)
Thanks but im still unable to boot in 64bit mode using -force64? It only boots using -legacy?
Using -legacy - all 32 bit apps work and 64bit apps but after 10min the 64bit apps crash and dont work but the 32 bit apps work fine.
If I boot using -force64 - it doesnt boot to Lion. Thanks for your help mate.

You NEED to have an amd cpu with SSSE3 instructions
IE Bulldozer, FX

maybe your confused with amd SSE3, no good for lion, requires SSSE3
if not, the system hangs with -force64 just before where launchd would say it's started up
launchd refuses to launch on my processor 64-bit

justinster123 05-01-2012 10:17 PM

@All try this one
specifically I applied the patch for R:A:W:X86
Please test :)
only fix I applied should be for pure 64-bit panic on some bulldozer, I'll look later,
g2g do chores -__-
and homework

http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?uyg3j8yuxgdx39z

felipeunix 05-01-2012 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justinster123 (Post 57355)
@All try this one
specifically I applied the patch for R:A:W:X86
Please test :)
only fix I applied should be for pure 64-bit panic on some bulldozer, I'll look later,
g2g do chores -__-
and homework

http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?uyg3j8yuxgdx39z

Here's my results:

Now I needed to add a flag "arch = i386" to be able to start.

1 - with "arch = i386" + "-legacy" ... obviously everything started in 32-bit .. but not frozen no apps .. a + this time - 45 minutes
only the finder you need to use the patch
apparently super stable.


2 - with "arch = i386" + "-force64" ... obviously already started with all 64-bit apps .. SUPER fast boot!
agility in any task.
finder does not need to patch.
But the 32-bit apps do not open.

felipeunix 05-02-2012 01:21 AM

some more tests and was able to prove the following:

with the original finder:

x64 - system slowdown, 32-bit apps will not open
x32 - does not open, but does not freeze applications!

with patch finder:

x64 - slowly resolved!!! 32-bit apps will not open
x32 - opens but freezes the application again ..


I'm using x64 and patch finder, I get no 32-bit apps, but with the system very quickly and without crashes ^^

thanks for the support, I am available for whatever you need me!

ghostec 05-02-2012 09:50 AM

Hey guys,

I just saw that qemu can emulate a processor type, something that vmware/virtualbox can't.
Anyone have already tried to use it to run OSX in a AMD box? (emulating a Intel processor, if it can).

R:A:W:X86 05-02-2012 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justinster123 (Post 57355)
@All try this one
specifically I applied the patch for R:A:W:X86

Thanks for the recompile & your other efforts.
I know that what you have done means a lot of work.

However it seems that those of AnV's code changes you added, are no use to me / the FX owners:

The x86_64 Kernel does not work, it is instant reboot.
i386 is all the same like using bronzovka's v3 patch in both legacy and 64-Bit mode.
still no success with patching sysenter traps in dyld.

Anyway you did a good job, if your changes make the legacy mode more stable for the non-SSSE3 AMD users. :)

lunfai 05-02-2012 09:53 PM

I'm thinking of getting a Intel G540 with a motherboard tomorrow and just move over.

justinster123 05-03-2012 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R:A:W:X86 (Post 57363)
Thanks for the recompile & your other efforts.
I know that what you have done means a lot of work.

However it seems that those of AnV's code changes you added, are no use to me / the FX owners:

The x86_64 Kernel does not work, it is instant reboot.
i386 is all the same like using bronzovka's v3 patch in both legacy and 64-Bit mode.
still no success with patching sysenter traps in dyld.

Anyway you did a good job, if your changes make the legacy mode more stable for the non-SSSE3 AMD users. :)

I'm not going to be working on the source for a while, school's first.
I will try and se if I can find time during French class to upload my source since my home internet connection isn't that fast.

Sorry, things have been tough but I invite you all to make this kernel perfect so we can have a working lion once and for all :)
goodbye,
I'll post the source tomorrow If i can

felipeunix 05-03-2012 07:18 AM

I'm starting here with:

arch = i386-force64

Everything is very stable .. (only with 64-bit apps of course)

But I can live well only with them.

Only one problem related to Safari, pages with java script, crashes it.

Does anyone know how to solve this?

R:A:W:X86 05-03-2012 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justinster123 (Post 57366)
my home internet connection isn't that fast.

Code:

diff -Nur xnu-1699.24.23_unpatched xnu-1699.24.23_patched > justinkernel.diff
This text file should be sized like a few 100KB - zip it and you can as well add it as attachment to this forum. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by felipeunix (Post 57368)
Only one problem related to Safari, pages with java script, crashes it.

Same like Internet Exploder - my fav browser for downloading a better one. :p

No problems with Firefox + Javascript

justinster123 05-03-2012 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R:A:W:X86 (Post 57371)
Code:

diff -Nur xnu-1699.24.23_unpatched xnu-1699.24.23_patched > justinkernel.diff
This text file should be sized like a few 100KB - zip it and you can as well add it as attachment to this forum. :)


Same like Internet Exploder - my fav browser for downloading a better one. :p

No problems with Firefox + Javascript

umm I regret to say this but I'll have to post the source when I get home, I woke up late and had to rush to catch the school bus....
I'll definitely post it then though :)

Lacedaemon 05-03-2012 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by felipeunix (Post 57368)
I'm starting here with:

arch = i386-force64

Everything is very stable .. (only with 64-bit apps of course)

But I can live well only with them.

Only one problem related to Safari, pages with java script, crashes it.

Does anyone know how to solve this?

I have the same problem with my Safari, only it's on Snow Leopard. Lion's Safari works perfectly, how can this be... :-/

felipeunix 05-03-2012 05:01 PM

just pointing out that this problem is just the java x64.
x86 works perfectly!

Firefox + javascript works fine.
but when scrolling the pages has no Vsync. It is horrible, is how to solve it at least?

I will test IE.

lunfai 05-03-2012 07:56 PM

I know this is off-topic but I've now moved onto Intel with G540 + P8H61-M LE. Going great so far, need to do the Lion stuff again. :(

lunfai 05-03-2012 08:57 PM

Bronzovka GURU has released a statement that he has created a new version of the kernel that does not hang standard applications! More information tomorrow. :)

justinster123 05-03-2012 10:33 PM

the diff I got is 51.4 mb ...
can't upload that now/...

R:A:W:X86 05-04-2012 09:12 AM

Maybe you need to try without BUILD folders... ;)

Just some idea that came across my mind this morning - I was too tired at our conversation yesterday, to be able to make such conclusions. :p

felipeunix 05-04-2012 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lunfai (Post 57378)
Bronzovka GURU has released a statement that he has created a new version of the kernel that does not hang standard applications! More information tomorrow. :)

It has been compiled? post here for us?:D

A3yu 05-04-2012 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by felipeunix (Post 57385)
It has been compiled? post here for us?:D

Not yet
http://www.applelife.ru/threads/mac-....31619/page-31
Take a look on the discussion once a hour

lunfai 05-04-2012 06:07 PM

I will post information if I see it. On the other hand got Lion running on my build and just got Mountain Lion running welcome setup, but then had to go to work. For $70 good investment to get a cheap working build. ^^

A3yu 05-04-2012 10:37 PM

Bronzovka we'll give news tomorrow,T..T

rhcp011235 05-05-2012 05:57 PM

all this talk and all this so called dev work being done here is great to look at.

But,

A) I see no source code for anything?
B) Binary built kernels that i have no idea what they do.

Why are people not posting kernels with source? why is this is a guessing game? do we want lion/ML to work on AMD or not? Seriously, Think about it.

justinster123 05-05-2012 06:07 PM

umm because the diff I get is too large and text editors would crash, I'll post it later sheesh, I'm busy, and I just attempted to apply ALL previous patches

Unrealized 05-05-2012 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rhcp011235 (Post 57389)
all this talk and all this so called dev work being done here is great to look at.

But,

A) I see no source code for anything?
B) Binary built kernels that i have no idea what they do.

Why are people not posting kernels with source? why is this is a guessing game? do we want lion/ML to work on AMD or not? Seriously, Think about it.

Exactly. This is why I sold my PC and went for Intel road. :D

rhcp011235 05-05-2012 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justinster123 (Post 57390)
umm because the diff I get is too large and text editors would crash, I'll post it later sheesh, I'm busy, and I just attempted to apply ALL previous patches

I've only seen ONE patch file. and it was posted by the orig russian dude.

I have not seen the FX series patch or anything else.

These things need to get on GIT/SVN/Google code or something. so people can work on it. Instead of bins being passed around that no one knows what the hell it does.

so there is two routes.


Also to note. When changes are to GNU code. the source should be posted. So, I dont know if this forum cares about this rule. but its being broken by everyone on it.

A) we play these games. and guess.
B) we get the code up and work. and make it work. (I think B is better)

Because A) will lead to nothing. Crash a text editor? it wont crash vi/nano or anything. its just a diff.

lunfai 05-05-2012 07:50 PM

Some of you sound ungrateful for anything. Just wait, he's not getting paid to do anything of this, and Dimitri isn't too, so stop sounding like spoilt children. If any of you was so keen to develop a fully working kernel with the source that's already provided in this thread, so work with that or just wait.

rhcp011235 05-05-2012 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lunfai (Post 57393)
Some of you sound ungrateful for anything. Just wait, he's not getting paid to do anything of this, and Dimitri isn't too, so stop sounding like spoilt children. If any of you was so keen to develop a fully working kernel with the source that's already provided in this thread, so work with that or just wait.

It's got nothing to do with getting paid. This is highly un-org. 60 pages of nothing.

no patch files. which take 3 seconds diff A X

if it was on GIT/SVN we could all work on it. instead of 1 person posting things. again with no source which is not GNU policy.

justinster123 05-05-2012 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lunfai (Post 57393)
Some of you sound ungrateful for anything. Just wait, he's not getting paid to do anything of this, and Dimitri isn't too, so stop sounding like spoilt children. If any of you was so keen to develop a fully working kernel with the source that's already provided in this thread, so work with that or just wait.

If only this site had a "Like" or "Retweet" button :')

lunfai 05-05-2012 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rhcp011235 (Post 57394)
It's got nothing to do with getting paid. This is highly un-org. 60 pages of nothing.

no patch files. which take 3 seconds diff A X

if it was on GIT/SVN we could all work on it. instead of 1 person posting things. again with no source which is not GNU policy.

http://osx86.co/f100/lion-with-amd-t7106/post56743.html

Here's the link to the v3 source. Instead of complaining go ahead and woe us. It might be under the GNU policy, but serious are you really going to sue him for not releasing? This is a forum, it's a discussion board, of course there's going to be a lot of posts that might not be of your taste, and it's not about getting paid, it's about the TIME AND EFFORT they put into developing the kernel. All the time and effort you've contributed is whining.

Seriously, now pick up your dummy.

davisin666 05-06-2012 01:42 AM

Looks like we will need to create a new branch of the kernel, and upload it to a version control system like git/svn.

BTW I'm selling my AMB MB/CPU in order to buy at least a 775 socket MB/CPU.
Nawcom is going to work in a kernel for AMD cpus, but I guess it will only work on Bulldozer processors.

http://blog.nawcom.com/?p=941

lunfai 05-06-2012 02:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davisin666 (Post 57397)
Looks like we will need to create a new branch of the kernel, and upload it to a version control system like git/svn.

BTW I'm selling my AMB MB/CPU in order to buy at least a 775 socket MB/CPU.
Nawcom is going to work in a kernel for AMD cpus, but I guess it will only work on Bulldozer processors.

http://blog.nawcom.com/?p=941

I got myself a 1155 socket MB (P8H61-L ME/USB3) for 60 dollars, real cheap. Supports Ivy bridge too. Running Mountain Lion D3 on it right now. ^^

felipeunix 05-06-2012 06:43 PM

I think the Nawcom will only work with the Mountain Lion.

Perhaps we should stick with the Snow Leopard for a long time ..

ryman 05-06-2012 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lunfai (Post 57378)
Bronzovka GURU has released a statement that he has created a new version of the kernel that does not hang standard applications! More information tomorrow. :)

Any news about that?

rhcp011235 05-06-2012 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lunfai (Post 57396)
http://osx86.co/f100/lion-with-amd-t7106/post56743.html

Here's the link to the v3 source. Instead of complaining go ahead and woe us. It might be under the GNU policy, but serious are you really going to sue him for not releasing? This is a forum, it's a discussion board, of course there's going to be a lot of posts that might not be of your taste, and it's not about getting paid, it's about the TIME AND EFFORT they put into developing the kernel. All the time and effort you've contributed is whining.

Seriously, now pick up your dummy.

That's one patch which was made. all its doing is blocking out panics. what has been done since then? as the other people have said. branch of kernel and patches put up.

This all non-sense here is getting us no where. and yes nawcom is working on some stuff.

lunfai 05-06-2012 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ryman (Post 57400)
Any news about that?

There's something wrong with the software update, but standard applications work. He's currently trying to fix this and trying to work out the encryption method in Lion.

aaqib7 05-06-2012 11:24 PM

cool good thing hes got the applications working ;) - and hope he figures out the problem.

aaqib7 05-06-2012 11:26 PM

Thanks to him and others programmers hopefully we should have a stable amd hackintosh - lion :)

lunfai 05-07-2012 07:21 AM

He's currently working on the CPUID, and he's trying to use Xcode to decrypt the transcript or some sort. More information as he writes, it sounds like progress is being made, so it should be soon (:

vishalkris000 05-07-2012 09:30 PM

guys any1 help me installing mac lion osx on my AMD Phenom x4 925...Mother Board-Gigabyte....Have any1 tried the Niresh's Distro...i tried but dnt boot with any of the Command....changed the Kernel in the Boot CD with the amd lion v4 and v5 files nothing happened...tied installing Iatkos new version and old version on...om 10.6.7 and also on 10.6.8...the Iatkos installation failed...plz guys any1 help me...

felipeunix 05-07-2012 10:30 PM

The sad thing is when you are ready to know that the kernel of the lion, the moutain lion will be released :'(

Fraom 05-08-2012 12:40 PM

Hi to all , i've tested lion on amd turion rm-74 64bit and it work ..... Hemmm work but whitout Finder :) :( it don't work ....

I've tested it on a USB hd

Edit : i've installed it from iatkos l2 whit mach kernel v5

ghostec 05-08-2012 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fraom (Post 57412)
Hi to all , i've tested lion on amd turion rm-74 64bit and it work ..... Hemmm work but whitout Finder :) :( it don't work ....

I've tested it on a USB hd

Edit : i've installed it from iatkos l2 whit mach kernel v5

There are 10 types of persons: The ones who read the previous posts and the ones who doesn't.

A3yu 05-08-2012 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghostec (Post 57414)
there are 10 types of persons: The ones who read the previous posts and the ones who doesn't.

mahahahahaahah

A3yu 05-08-2012 08:57 PM

PHOTOSHOP CS6 WORKS ONLY IN 64 BIT MODE...I THINK THAT FOR ME AMD TIME IS OVER T_T

MY SPEC :
Cpu : AMD Athlon II X2 250 Dual Core 3.00 GHz
Mobo: ASRock N68C-S UCC | Gpu : ATI HD 5670 1GB DDR5 | Audio: Via audio
Chipset : Nvidia nForce 630a Ram: 2x2 GB DDR2/800 | Dvd : LG ide DVD-burner
HD: Western Digital 500 Gb 7200 RPM Sata OS : Snow Leopard 10.6.8

Can anyone recommend me a good Intel Cpu and a good mobo..for install mountain lion at 64 bit ??

Not more than 200 € for all..less is better XD

Visioneer 05-08-2012 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A3yu (Post 57416)
PHOTOSHOP CS6 WORKS ONLY IN 64 BIT MODE...I THINK THAT FOR ME AMD TIME IS OVER T_T

MY SPEC :
Cpu : AMD Athlon II X2 250 Dual Core 3.00 GHz
Mobo: ASRock N68C-S UCC | Gpu : ATI HD 5670 1GB DDR5 | Audio: Via audio
Chipset : Nvidia nForce 630a Ram: 2x2 GB DDR2/800 | Dvd : LG ide DVD-burner
HD: Western Digital 500 Gb 7200 RPM Sata OS : Snow Leopard 10.6.8

Can anyone recommend me a good Intel Cpu and a good mobo..for install mountain lion at 64 bit ??

Not more than 200 € for all..less is better XD

Why are you complaining about CS6 only working in 64-bit mode? IF it runs, and works, then you SHOULD use 64-bit no matter what... Or do you mean 64-bit kernel causing other 32-bit apps to not work? You're not being specific enough to have even determined if you need to change hardware or not.