InfiniteMac OSx86

InfiniteMac OSx86 (http://infinitemac.com/forum.php)
-   Lion 10.7 (http://infinitemac.com/forumdisplay.php?f=100)
-   -   Lion with AMD (http://infinitemac.com/showthread.php?t=7106)

lunfai 05-05-2012 07:50 PM

Some of you sound ungrateful for anything. Just wait, he's not getting paid to do anything of this, and Dimitri isn't too, so stop sounding like spoilt children. If any of you was so keen to develop a fully working kernel with the source that's already provided in this thread, so work with that or just wait.

rhcp011235 05-05-2012 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lunfai (Post 57393)
Some of you sound ungrateful for anything. Just wait, he's not getting paid to do anything of this, and Dimitri isn't too, so stop sounding like spoilt children. If any of you was so keen to develop a fully working kernel with the source that's already provided in this thread, so work with that or just wait.

It's got nothing to do with getting paid. This is highly un-org. 60 pages of nothing.

no patch files. which take 3 seconds diff A X

if it was on GIT/SVN we could all work on it. instead of 1 person posting things. again with no source which is not GNU policy.

justinster123 05-05-2012 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lunfai (Post 57393)
Some of you sound ungrateful for anything. Just wait, he's not getting paid to do anything of this, and Dimitri isn't too, so stop sounding like spoilt children. If any of you was so keen to develop a fully working kernel with the source that's already provided in this thread, so work with that or just wait.

If only this site had a "Like" or "Retweet" button :')

lunfai 05-05-2012 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rhcp011235 (Post 57394)
It's got nothing to do with getting paid. This is highly un-org. 60 pages of nothing.

no patch files. which take 3 seconds diff A X

if it was on GIT/SVN we could all work on it. instead of 1 person posting things. again with no source which is not GNU policy.

http://osx86.co/f100/lion-with-amd-t7106/post56743.html

Here's the link to the v3 source. Instead of complaining go ahead and woe us. It might be under the GNU policy, but serious are you really going to sue him for not releasing? This is a forum, it's a discussion board, of course there's going to be a lot of posts that might not be of your taste, and it's not about getting paid, it's about the TIME AND EFFORT they put into developing the kernel. All the time and effort you've contributed is whining.

Seriously, now pick up your dummy.

davisin666 05-06-2012 01:42 AM

Looks like we will need to create a new branch of the kernel, and upload it to a version control system like git/svn.

BTW I'm selling my AMB MB/CPU in order to buy at least a 775 socket MB/CPU.
Nawcom is going to work in a kernel for AMD cpus, but I guess it will only work on Bulldozer processors.

http://blog.nawcom.com/?p=941

lunfai 05-06-2012 02:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davisin666 (Post 57397)
Looks like we will need to create a new branch of the kernel, and upload it to a version control system like git/svn.

BTW I'm selling my AMB MB/CPU in order to buy at least a 775 socket MB/CPU.
Nawcom is going to work in a kernel for AMD cpus, but I guess it will only work on Bulldozer processors.

http://blog.nawcom.com/?p=941

I got myself a 1155 socket MB (P8H61-L ME/USB3) for 60 dollars, real cheap. Supports Ivy bridge too. Running Mountain Lion D3 on it right now. ^^

felipeunix 05-06-2012 06:43 PM

I think the Nawcom will only work with the Mountain Lion.

Perhaps we should stick with the Snow Leopard for a long time ..

ryman 05-06-2012 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lunfai (Post 57378)
Bronzovka GURU has released a statement that he has created a new version of the kernel that does not hang standard applications! More information tomorrow. :)

Any news about that?

rhcp011235 05-06-2012 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lunfai (Post 57396)
http://osx86.co/f100/lion-with-amd-t7106/post56743.html

Here's the link to the v3 source. Instead of complaining go ahead and woe us. It might be under the GNU policy, but serious are you really going to sue him for not releasing? This is a forum, it's a discussion board, of course there's going to be a lot of posts that might not be of your taste, and it's not about getting paid, it's about the TIME AND EFFORT they put into developing the kernel. All the time and effort you've contributed is whining.

Seriously, now pick up your dummy.

That's one patch which was made. all its doing is blocking out panics. what has been done since then? as the other people have said. branch of kernel and patches put up.

This all non-sense here is getting us no where. and yes nawcom is working on some stuff.

lunfai 05-06-2012 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ryman (Post 57400)
Any news about that?

There's something wrong with the software update, but standard applications work. He's currently trying to fix this and trying to work out the encryption method in Lion.