![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
9500GT beats GT220 like crazy??
Doing a system upgrade on another machine, I had a spare GT220 to play with: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814127455
by most reviews (http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu_list.php), its supposed to be _marginally_ better than the 9500GT (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814127419) I am currently using. (460 vs 361 on the passmark site) (FWIW, in case anyone wants to use this card, I plugged in the 220 and it came right up.) But when I ran Xbench, I see (green is the 9500GT, red is the GT220) Quartz 268.95 -> 191.70 OpenGL 187.51-> 151.08 any ideas why its doing so badly compared to the 9500? GA-G31M-ES2L.v1, E6300 @ 2.8GHz, nvidia GT240 (or 9500GT), 10.6.6, fakeSMC rev454 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Gt220 = 9400 gt
gt240 = 9500 gt gts250 = 9600 gt Desktop: Mobo: G41/ICH7 | CPU: C2D E6320 | Mems: 2Gb DDR2 | Graphics: X1650 512MB | HD: 250GB SATA2 (Clean) + 320GB IDE (Win7 HP SP1) Laptop: K50IN / T5900 / 4GB DDR2 / 250 gb Sata / G102M 512mb / Atheros 9285 Wifi / RTL8139 / OSX 10.6.4 . EVERYTHING WORKS , only media keys not working. Playing: Counter-Strike Source , GTAIV , Resident Evil 5, Call Of Duty 4. XLIVE Gamertag: xuwannacookiex w/o Live Gold sub yet =( |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
that agrees with what I see in practice.. but according to Passmark (http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu_list.php), the 220 should beat the 9500?1!?!?
GA-G31M-ES2L.v1, E6300 @ 2.8GHz, nvidia GT240 (or 9500GT), 10.6.6, fakeSMC rev454 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Actually GTS 250 = 9800GTX+
💡 Deploy cloud instances seamlessly on DigitalOcean. Free credits ($100) for InfMac readers. Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3 & [email protected], GeForce GTS 250, Linksys WMP300N v.2, M-Audio Transit USB MSI P43-Neo & E7400, GeForce 9600GT, TP-Link TL-WN951N, Terratec Aureon 5.1 USB MK II |