Mac OS X on x86 Hardware 2008–2024 Technical Archive
InfiniteMac OSx86 › General Discussion › Parallels Desktop updated to 3.0.5600
9,145 reads · 2008-05-11 – 2008-05-13
Report General

Parallels Desktop updated to 3.0.5600

Parallels Inc. has updated its virtualization application Parallels Desktop to a new version 3.0.5600. It now supports Windows Vista SP1 & Windows XP SP3. More Info --> Parallels Desktop updated to 3.0.5600 Download ---> Parallels Desktop…

Primary Author
@Puttabong Published 2008-05-11
Collection
General Discussion
Archival Footprint
9,145 historical reads · 7 curated field notes (from 11 dispatches) · 2008-05-11 – 2008-05-13
Credited Voices (4)
@Puttabong (4)@naquaada (4)@WinLinMac01 (2)@creative_

Parallels Inc. has updated its virtualization application Parallels Desktop to a new version 3.0.5600.

<a href=""><img src="" border="0"></a>

It now supports Windows Vista SP1 & Windows XP SP3.

More Info --> <a href="Parallels Desktop updated to 3.0.5600 →">Parallels Desktop updated to 3.0.5600</a>

Download ---> <a href="kqz yfj.com/click-2894026-10467427" target="_top">Parallels Desktop for Mac - run Windows on your Mac OS X without rebooting!</a>
<img src="awlt ovhc.com/image-2894026-10467427" width="1" height="1" border="0"/>
Do you need or use virtualization software? If yes, which application do you prefer, <b>Parallels</b> or <b>VMware</b>?

Please feel free to share your experiences.

I personally prefer Parallels Desktop.
I use it on my Mac to test and play with Linux distros sometimes, I like OpenSolaris a lot.

Author Updates & Technical Revisions

Follow-up dispatches by @Puttabong

Author Update #1 @Puttabong 2008-05-11

Heh naquaada, that remote switching sounds nice. I like the Parallels Effects.

edit: yes, I know that you need that Infrared hardware part by microsoft and mira for it, you told me in IRC

Author Update #2 @Puttabong 2008-05-12

Naquaada which operating systems do you virtualize with Parallels? Certainly not Windows I suppose

Author Update #3 @Puttabong 2008-05-13

WinLinMac, did you already try the latest version? Maybe it improves your Vista experience.

Synthesized Community Field Notes

7 technical responses curated from 11 original dispatches

Field Note #1 @naquaada 2008-05-11

There's also an freeware virtualizer for OS X: QEMU

Homepage: fabrice.bellard.fr ee.fr/qemu/index.html

Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QEMU ↗

ThinkMac article: think mac.net/review/review-q-free-virtualizer

Field Note #2 @creative_ 2008-05-11

I prefere Parallels Desktop. Easy to use and no bugs for me yet.

Field Note #3 @naquaada 2008-05-11

I also like parallels Desktop, I hadn't tested others yet. I use the Apple Remote to switch between fullscreen, window and coherence mode

Field Note #4 @naquaada 2008-05-11

Erm, the freeware virtualizer I really wanted to post here is VirtualBox (virtual box.org/). QEMU is another one, also for PowerPC.

@ Puttabong: But you need the Apple Remote Software Mira for it, Parallels has no inbuilt function for this.

Field Note #5 @naquaada 2008-05-12

Actually none My 10.5.1 system is still experimental. I used Windows Media Center 2005 in Parralels. But I have no real Win installation anymore. I tested DOS 6.22, 7.01 and Solaris 10.

Can you write an dvd image with Toast? My system is always crashing since when I do that. I hope it's not the Opteron

Field Note #6 @WinLinMac01 2008-05-12

For me, Windows XP is better in Parallels Deskop than in VMWare fusion, whereas, Windows Vista is better in VMFusion than in Parallels Desktop. Weird huh? However, my preference is still Parallels, no doubt about it. =)

Field Note #7 @WinLinMac01 2008-05-13

Puttabong, I will try, and let you know. =) Hopefully it will, with less of a lag, lol. - Cheers

Sources & Contributor Provenance (4 credited usernames · Thread #1036)
UsernameDossier ContributionDispatchesActive Window
@PuttabongPrimary Author42008-05-11 → 2008-05-13
@naquaadaCore Contributor42008-05-11 → 2008-05-12
@WinLinMac01Contributor22008-05-12 → 2008-05-13
@creative_Contributor12008-05-11