InfiniteMac OSx86  


Reply
 
Thread tools Display modes
  #1  
Old 08-06-2012, 10:24 PM
frisco2's Avatar
frisco2 frisco2 is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by justinster123 View Post
I compiled a 10.7.4 kernel with a mix of patches with R:A:W 's patches and the anv's legacy kernel 0.5.1 for on the fly patching, it boots up for x86_64 and i386 without instant reboot. but gives a kernel panic near where launchd would start up...
I'll upload it soon for you to test.. I doubt you'll get any further than the KP tho, interesting that I am the only one who made a kernel that didn't instantly reboot....
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?u3kbvqy9it4sjda

Hi justinster123,

here my test with LION 10.7.4
with the following boot flag:

usekernelcache=no cpus=6 maxmem=4096 -v, f

and with

-legacy usekernelcache=no -force64 arch=x86_64 busratio=17 cpus=6 maxmem=4096 –v -f

and with

-legacy usekernelcache=no -force64 arch=i386 busratio=17 cpus=6 maxmem=4096 -v - f

I get every time a KP, see picture


pictures:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/4n3025
http://www.sendspace.com/file/dr5g00
http://www.sendspace.com/file/3e05iw
http://www.sendspace.com/file/3nyi0n

Mainboard:
GA-990FXA-UD3
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller
Realtek High Definition Audio
CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
RAM: 16 GB Corsair DDR3 1600 C9
NVIDIA Geforce GTX 550 TI 3072 MB
DVD SATA
HDD:
Segate 2 TB
WD 320 GB
WD 500 GB
-----------------------------------------------------
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit
Snow Leopard 10.6.8
Lion 10.7.2
Lion 10.7.4

HOW-TO look here

Last edited by frisco2; 08-06-2012 at 10:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-06-2012, 11:54 PM
gils's Avatar
gils gils is offline
Panther
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 194
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by frisco2 View Post
Hi justinster123,

here my test with LION 10.7.4
with the following boot flag:

usekernelcache=no cpus=6 maxmem=4096 -v, f

and with

-legacy usekernelcache=no -force64 arch=x86_64 busratio=17 cpus=6 maxmem=4096 –v -f

and with

-legacy usekernelcache=no -force64 arch=i386 busratio=17 cpus=6 maxmem=4096 -v - f

I get every time a KP, see picture


pictures:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/4n3025
http://www.sendspace.com/file/dr5g00
http://www.sendspace.com/file/3e05iw
http://www.sendspace.com/file/3nyi0n
hello frisco2,

résulat same as you, I give up for now, I ordered a small FX 6100 to 119 € with 15 € for reimbursement by AMD.

The x4 960 t , I'll put it back in its box and put it on my mantle for memories of good times !!!

Macmini early 2006 /blanGsak 10.7.2
Acer 8930 G / core2duo T6500 / NV 9600 GS m / Lion 10.7.3 / ML 10.8.2 / w7/8
Asus M5A97pro / FX 8350 / Asus HD 7950 CUII v2
GA-78LMT SP2 / FX 6100 / P x4 960t / Sapphire HD 4850 1024
MSI K9neo v1 / Atlon 4800+/ Gigabyte HD 5450 512
test kernel 12.0 AMD

Tuto : http://www.hack-my-mac.fr/index.php/...fx-buldo#28896

CG opérationnelle : HD 5450 512 / HD 4850 1 / GT 610
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-07-2012, 01:41 PM
wastez's Avatar
wastez wastez is offline
Panther
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by frisco2 View Post
Hi justinster123,

here my test with LION 10.7.4
with the following boot flag:

usekernelcache=no cpus=6 maxmem=4096 -v, f

and with

-legacy usekernelcache=no -force64 arch=x86_64 busratio=17 cpus=6 maxmem=4096 –v -f

and with

-legacy usekernelcache=no -force64 arch=i386 busratio=17 cpus=6 maxmem=4096 -v - f

I get every time a KP, see picture


pictures:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/4n3025
http://www.sendspace.com/file/dr5g00
http://www.sendspace.com/file/3e05iw
http://www.sendspace.com/file/3nyi0n
Some informations to your kernelflags:
1. Don´t use arch=x86_64 and -legacy togehter, cause you can use 32 bit or 64 bit kernelmode and not both at same time.

2. arch=i386 and -legacy is the same but i think only -legacy is implemented in this kernel.

3. -force64 is not implemented in this kernel so it´s absolutly useless.
(On SnowLeopard it was used to enable 64 bit userland while running 32 bit kernelmode)

Last edited by wastez; 08-07-2012 at 01:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-07-2012, 02:20 PM
R:A:W:X86's Avatar
R:A:W:X86 R:A:W:X86 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by wastez View Post
2. arch=i386 and -legacy is the same but i think only -legacy is implemented in this kernel.
Absolutely not the same.
arch= gives advice to Chameleon wether the i386 or x86_64 should be loaded, while -legacy disables the use of EM64T in case the i386 Kernel is loaded. (so to say the opposite / disbaler of -force64 mode, which is now loaded by default on all CPU like when you are using the Vanilla Kernel.)

AMD FX 4100
MSI 760GM-P23
Radeon HD6570
OS X Lion Retail 10.7.5
Lion Kernel Project
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-08-2012, 03:33 PM
wastez's Avatar
wastez wastez is offline
Panther
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by R:A:W:X86 View Post
Absolutely not the same.
arch= gives advice to Chameleon wether the i386 or x86_64 should be loaded, while -legacy disables the use of EM64T in case the i386 Kernel is loaded. (so to say the opposite / disbaler of -force64 mode, which is now loaded by default on all CPU like when you are using the Vanilla Kernel.)
Thanks for the information, it´s good to know.

Thought it was implemented instead of arch=i386.

Quote:
Originally Posted by frisco2 View Post
my usb keyboard works no more.
with the PS2 Keyboard hangs at USBF: 6719 AppleUSBOHCI........ without this message >>> still waiting for root device
I had the same problem on my system.
Using a other kernel fixed it on my computer.

Last edited by wastez; 08-08-2012 at 03:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-05-2012, 09:46 PM
The Connactic The Connactic is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 89
Great job, Justin! Cool that someone takes the torch from RAW and keeps it running for AMD machines. If a 64-bit kernel is really built, we can even make it to Mountain Lion someday!

Did you ran your kernel on a FX series CPU, or on an older series (therefore, lacking the need of ssse3 support)? Can you upload a screen of your KP, for us to help identify the causes?

Thanks in advance!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-05-2012, 09:49 PM
justinster123 justinster123 is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Connactic View Post
Great job, Justin! Cool that someone takes the torch from RAW and keeps it running for AMD machines. If a 64-bit kernel is really built, we can even make it to Mountain Lion someday!

Did you ran your kernel on a FX series CPU, or on an older series (therefore, lacking the need of ssse3 support)? Can you upload a screen of your KP, for us to help identify the causes?

Thanks in advance!
Yes, I Will do that, I'm trying to compile the kernel again making some patches to see if it changed anything, but I tested it on a normal NON ssse3 amd cpu,
AMD Athlon X2 7550

the KP is NOT related to ACPI like in the previous kernels for Snow Leopard. It's to do with the patcher I think, Let me upload a screenie soon
In the meantime, Please try it yourself and let me know your results
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-05-2012, 10:41 PM
The Connactic The Connactic is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 89
I'll do just that, but i'm afraid i'll get similar results, since i have a similar dual core, one generation newer, an Athlon II X2 250. Two questions:

1) The KP you got was when booting arch X64_86? Or both archs?

2) Assuming it's possible to boot arch=i386, did it give you 64-bit apps support on your 32-bit non ssse3 capable system? It would be an important thing to know, because it would be a step further even without a true 64-bit kernel with 64-bit extensions (the latest RAW kernel give 64-bit support for i386 kernels, but only on ssse3 capable CPUs).

Thank you, and keep up the good work!

Last edited by The Connactic; 08-05-2012 at 10:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-05-2012, 10:48 PM
justinster123 justinster123 is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Connactic View Post
I'll do just that, but i'm afraid i'll get similar results, since i have a similar dual core, one generation newer, an Athlon II X2 250. Two questions:

1) The KP you got was when booting arch X64_86? Or both archs?

2) Assuming it's possible to boot arch=i386, did it give you 64-bit apps support on your 32-bit non ssse3 capable system? It would be an important thing to know, because it would be a step further even without a true 64-bit kernel with 64-bit extensions (the latest RAW kernel give 64-bit support for i386 kernels, but only on ssse3 capable CPUs).

Thank you, and keep up the good work!
Any boot flag gives that KP, it has something to do with the integration of the on the fly patcher...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-05-2012, 11:09 PM
ham4ever ham4ever is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 37
good work Justin , i'd really love to test ur kernel as soon i get a new HDD keep the hard work guys
Reply With Quote
Reply