InfiniteMac OSx86  


Reply
 
Thread tools Display modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2008, 04:47 AM
compaqdrew compaqdrew is offline
Puma
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 21
Quote:
Should I include latest Quicktime and iLife update ?
Yes.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-14-2008, 04:55 AM
guliath guliath is offline
Puma
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
i vote to include them
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2008, 04:57 AM
HCE HCE is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 47
I vote to leave them out and let people decide if they want them later on.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:00 AM
guliath guliath is offline
Puma
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
wait, can i insatll them EASILLY later? in that case i vote for the NO INCLUDED thing
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:02 AM
HCE HCE is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 47
I believe it's simply a matter of downloading/installing them. That's why I vote for leaving the installation image as light as possible. But that's just me.
P.S.: If I'm wrong, then better include it, it will surely make some people happy.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:04 AM
zephyroth's Avatar
zephyroth zephyroth is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North of France
Posts: 518
ok no cpuid for iLife and only one for QuickTime (QuickTime.components) so it should be easy to install later.

Mac OS X 10.6.3 • 2.8 GHz Intel Core I7 860 • ASUS P7P55D • 2 GB 2 Ghz DDR3 • ATI RADEON XFX 4890 1GB • 2 x Hitachi 160 GB Serial-ATA • PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-112 • LaCie Desktop Harddrive 750 GB USB
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:13 AM
eard eard is offline
Puma
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
i vote to include them
anyway, we will to downlad them later, so download the iso with the files inside
is the same thing but more easy :P
but
Quote:
[cite] zephyroth:[/cite]ok no cpuid for iLife and only one for QuickTime (QuickTime.components) so it should be easy to install later.
i think is better, i dont use iLife :P
tnx and cya latr!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:23 AM
lbodrozic lbodrozic is offline
Cheetah
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1
quick question, just to verify...

previous posts indicate that zephyroth's 10.5.2 rev1 will have sse2 only support. is that still the case?

i ask only b/c i see there will be some kernel updates to this release. want to make sure the sse2 only support doesn't get squashed in the process.

thanks, and great work you all!

[update]: by sse2 only support, i mean support for procs that do not have sse3. obviously if you have both, you're already all set.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:32 AM
DoiX DoiX is offline
Tiger
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Romania
Posts: 355
lol in 10.5.1 rev 1 zeph forgot to add the sse2 kernel meaning it had only sse3 kernel 10.5.1 rev2(not released to the public) has sse2 and sse3 kernel, 10.5.2 is 10.5.1 rev2 with the updates an other stuff (this one will be released to the public) has sse2/3 kernel support(as 10.5.1 rev2)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:33 AM
Ianxxx Ianxxx is offline
Leopard
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 645
Zeph I know you must get sick of this but I'm really really curious, how did you solve the nforce lan problem. I have 10.5.2 up and running new kernel etc. But still have the same issue.
Reply With Quote
Reply