InfiniteMac OSx86  


Reply
 
Thread tools Display modes
  #1  
Old 02-06-2011, 08:53 PM
eluminx eluminx is offline
Cheetah
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
just installed v4 on a .6.6 upgrade and nothing is working. If i try to boot with x86_64 i get a kernel panic at boot. I can boot with i386 -force64 but none of the apps installed will worked. Opera, itunes, adium etc.. i get the usual error.

Specs: AMD PII 945, 8 gig ram, ATI 5750, GB GA-MA790XT-ud4p. Any help, would be greatly appreciated. i been trying to understand what dyld patching is but i can't seem the understand how to accomplish this, or what it does, am i that dumb? or can anyone shed some light on the issue.

Quote:
Process: Opera [440]
Path: /Applications/Opera.app/Contents/MacOS/Opera
Identifier: com.operasoftware.Opera
Version: ??? (???)
Build Info: Unknown-Unknown~1190
Code Type: X86 (Native)
Parent Process: launchd [319]

Date/Time: 2011-02-06 19:48:08.510 +0000
OS Version: Mac OS X 10.6.6 (10J567)
Report Version: 6

Interval Since Last Report: 8480 sec
Crashes Since Last Report: 2023
Per-App Crashes Since Last Report: 18
Anonymous UUID:

Exception Type: EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION (SIGILL)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000001, 0x0000000000000000
Crashed Thread: 0

Thread 0 Crashed:
0 dyld 0x8fe28563 _sysenter_trap + 3
1 dyld 0x8fe2a35a mach_init + 47
2 dyld 0x8fe01766 dyldbootstrap::start(macho_header const*, int, char const**, long) + 448
3 dyld 0x8fe01057 _dyld_start + 39

Thread 0 crashed with X86 Thread State (32-bit):
eax: 0xffffffe4 ebx: 0x8fe2a21c ecx: 0xbffffaac edx: 0x8fe2aa62
edi: 0x00000000 esi: 0x00000000 ebp: 0xbffffaf8 esp: 0xbffffaac
ss: 0x0000001f efl: 0x00010282 eip: 0x8fe28563 cs: 0x00000017
ds: 0x0000001f es: 0x0000001f fs: 0x00000000 gs: 0x00000000
cr2: 0x8fe28560

Binary Images:
0x8fe00000 - 0x8fe3a00b dyld 0.0 (???) <99EE96F3-1F18-5AA1-6381-1E3A79839317> /usr/lib/dyld

Model: MacPro3,1, BootROM MP31.006C.B05, 4 processors, 3.01 GHz, 8 GB, SMC 1.30f3
Graphics: ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series, ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series, PCIe, 1024 MB
Memory Module: global_name
Network Service: Ethernet Adaptor (en1), Ethernet, en1
PCI Card: ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series, Display, Slot-1
Serial ATA Device: WDC WD6401AALS-00L3B2, 596.17 GB
Serial ATA Device: ST3250824AS, 232.89 GB
Serial ATA Device: TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-S223Q
Serial ATA Device: ST3640323AS, 596.17 GB
USB Device: Photosmart D5100 series, 0x03f0 (Hewlett Packard), 0xc402, 0x52400000
USB Device: Cypress AT2+LP, 0x04b4 (Cypress Semiconductor), 0x6830, 0x52300000
USB Device: USB2.0-CRW, 0x0bda (Realtek Semiconductor Corp.), 0x0151, 0x53200000
USB Device: USB Receiver, 0x046d (Logitech Inc.), 0xc521, 0x12100000
USB Device: Microsoft® Nano Transceiver v1.0, 0x045e (Microsoft Corporation), 0x0745, 0x33200000
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-09-2011, 09:38 AM
wastez's Avatar
wastez wastez is offline
Panther
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 182
I tried this kernel ones more but nothing changed, the most software did not work with it......
Do i´ve to insert the std_dyld=yes into the boot.plist or is it anough to write it as kernel flag during the boot up?

Greetz
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-09-2011, 02:54 PM
chitchit chitchit is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Someone with a sse2 only cpu, please try this! I want to make sure that someone else gets my error!

And Wastez, as long as you enter it correctly, entering it in the com.boot.apple.plist is the same as adding it while booting, just that when you boot, you have to type it every time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-2011, 04:31 PM
wastez's Avatar
wastez wastez is offline
Panther
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 182
@ bkribbs

It´s not exactly the same because when i enter it by the bootup it insert it in kernel flags.
The other way is to enter it as several point in boot.plist.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-17-2011, 09:45 AM
wastez's Avatar
wastez wastez is offline
Panther
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 182
@ andy

What´s going on with the kernel?
Will there come a new version and what about the dyld is it still in beta?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-17-2011, 01:49 PM
wastez's Avatar
wastez wastez is offline
Panther
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 182
Can anyone tell me why my AMD- System get slower with x86_64 then i386 -force64?

Would be really interessting why......
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-17-2011, 02:15 PM
chitchit chitchit is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by wastez View Post
Can anyone tell me why my AMD- System get slower with x86_64 then i386 -force64?

Would be really interessting why......
He's still working on it. And the first one is running it in 64-bit mode, while the second is 32 bit, while forcing some applications to use 64 bi mode.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-19-2011, 05:44 PM
andyvand's Avatar
andyvand andyvand is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tienen
Posts: 515
Quote:
Originally Posted by wastez View Post
@ andy

What´s going on with the kernel?
Will there come a new version and what about the dyld is it still in beta?
Yes it is still beta (but improved so far).
The unwind code is what makes some apps not work without using UPX to pack it.
I'm trying to adapt the code to make it work better...
I'll continue my research...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-20-2011, 03:12 AM
davisin666 davisin666 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 98
Thanks Andy for your work!

System
  • MoBo: MSI K9N2GM-FD, Chipset GeForce 8200 (MCP78)
  • CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ @3,02 Ghz
  • RAM: Kingston 2GB DDR2 800Mhz + Corsair 2GB DDR2 800Mhz @747Mhz
  • VGA: EVGA 9800GT SSC
  • HDD: 300GB WD SATAII
  • Optical Drive: Sony SATA 24X
  • OS: Vanilla Mac OS X Server 10.6.0 + Nawcom ModCD, upgraded to 10.6.8 and Windows 7 x64.
Everything works, except sleep, so system isn't Energy Star compilant .
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-18-2011, 01:37 AM
chitchit chitchit is offline
Jaguar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Now I could be wrong with all that. But I believe that x86_64 is 64 bit
Reply With Quote
Reply