#51
|
|||
|
|||
whats the benifets? is it like 9.6.0 Vanillia? does this mean we can boot retail? im very confused lol
Computer: Gateway 838GM | 9.5.0 Vodoo Kernel |2.0 RC4 Chameleon Bootloader | Processor:Intel Pentium 4 630 / 3 GHz | RAM: 512MB | OS: Windows 7 32BIT, OSx86 iPC 10.5.6 | Mainboard Chipset: Intel 915G Express | Graphics Card:Integrated Intel GMA 900 | Video Memory: Dynamic Video Memory Technology 3.0 | Audio:ALC 860 |Card Reader:8 in 1 Integrated| Hard Drives:1x 200GB SATA(Win 7), 1x 320GB SATA(OS X) Both Internal
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
For more info look at the download site... |
#53
|
||||
|
||||
Did it happen only once or did it happen each time Firefox was running?
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
Fortunately only once.
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
OK then I doubt it is a kernel bug...
It may just have been "bad luck"... Lets hope it doesn't happen again... |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
yea i went to the google code web page but it there wasn't any info about it... it said the newest version was 9.5.0 not 9.6.0
Computer: Gateway 838GM | 9.5.0 Vodoo Kernel |2.0 RC4 Chameleon Bootloader | Processor:Intel Pentium 4 630 / 3 GHz | RAM: 512MB | OS: Windows 7 32BIT, OSx86 iPC 10.5.6 | Mainboard Chipset: Intel 915G Express | Graphics Card:Integrated Intel GMA 900 | Video Memory: Dynamic Video Memory Technology 3.0 | Audio:ALC 860 |Card Reader:8 in 1 Integrated| Hard Drives:1x 200GB SATA(Win 7), 1x 320GB SATA(OS X) Both Internal
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'll beat them to the punch too with 9.7.0 if I get the chance It is a matter of honour since some of the Voodoo team didn't threat me very well... You fix up the warnings in the VoodooPS2 sources and give them the diffs (actually first the sources but next they nagged for the diffs...) and all they did was criticize... They also argued that one big project over 6 smaller ones was "harder to debug"... Man are you devs or not is the question I tend to have then... It makes no difference as one can switch the target etc... Quote:
Last edited by andyvand; 05-02-2009 at 02:14 AM. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Before I start, I want you to know that I wouldn't reply if the drama wasn't started by the above poster, but I couldn't just let this go unanswered.
Quote:
Voodoo didn't complete the port to 9.6.0 because it takes "time" and "effort" (which isn't available) to do it "properly", you think after the work they did, they can't just go and make the fast dirty port you did? Are you going to say "Man are you devs or not is the question I tend to have then..." because of that too? What is this attitude of "beat to the punch" from you? Is it all about that for you? /shame I see people doing "real" work, the Voodoo kernel, VoodooPower..., the IOPCIFamily/IOUSBFamily.. kext mods, and I see you take that, fix warnings (most of the time unproperly), retag/rebrand, increment the version, and make it look like an update to the official releases. /shame You never replied to direct technical questions concerning your additions to the voodoo kernel/projects, and the explanation is obviously because you have no idea. You would have answered otherwise, wouldn't you? The Voodoo group (specifically, Dense here on this post) contacted you (twice if not more) and invited you to join us on IRC to have a little chat about how to get working together, as we did with few others which are with us now, joined the efforts together, and you already have seen the fruits of it, but you didn't accept to come (IIRC you didn't even reply). Why? my guess is you don't want to join a group of people, you prefer to be on your own, because all you care about is some childish fame which you obviously have got it on the InsanelyMac forum (and apparently, here too). About your "stripped" version of the VPS2 story, why not post the link to the real source, so people know what happens? http://forum.voodooprojects.org/inde...pic,168.0.html I read that this forum isn't like InsanelyMac, so I'm sure this post will be here when I check back. I'm going to ask the people who read this not to reply (except AnV, if he wants), so the drama doesn't grow, and the flaming doesn't start, please? Last edited by Kabyl; 05-06-2009 at 12:01 AM. |
#59
|
||||
|
||||
First of all last release is more than proper...
The technical questions about my port? Ask away... I've never seen any message directed at me with any questions nor have I ever received a mail stating any q's about it... My point is not a "beat to the puch" attitude... it is to make something better with more features... Retagging and rebranding only occurs if it is either something I made or it isn't desired to keep that name (like with the kernel after integration of the decrypter...) And it is my thought that fixing warnings up and perfecting code will result in a faster and better product (I've seen this proven many times...) also I find it important to use the latest toolset and some updated libraries from the kernel... Next the IOPCIFamily and IOUSBFamily releases are slightly different from the others and in case of the IOUSBFamily parts it does state for PCGenUSBEHCI the proper copyrights (me and the other author...) You are wrong stating that I don't want to join a group of people and you are wrong stating that I don't allready work togheter with some... Also fast and dirty port? the first two ones: yes... the last 2: absolutely not... I've never even noticed the posts... how could I have replied then? Quote:
Just the main page and page 3 selected below... But I don't want there to be any further future misunderstandings between us though... If you should have any questions you should mail me for them... |
#60
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And what shows that you usually have no idea what you're doing is something like this; (quoting you): Quote:
Quote:
It's just your regular way of releasing; NEW (lack of info..) works a lot better (no info..) Enjoy (a smiley showing confidence) Edit: fixed more issue (no idea what..) You get asked each time what's new, what improvements does it bring, and then there is the usual kind of replies; fixed warnings, perfecting the code, proper Apple IDs, and then something that may look useful (but unfortunately, not after checking the code...) You, now, need to do much more to get your stuff working with this solution.. Quote:
Quote:
And I have to say that you can do better than this. 💡 Deploy cloud instances seamlessly on DigitalOcean. Free credits ($100) for InfMac readers. Last edited by Kabyl; 05-05-2009 at 10:14 PM. |