InfiniteMac OSx86  


Reply
 
Thread tools Display modes
  #1  
Old 06-17-2009, 03:13 PM
erick2red's Avatar
erick2red erick2red is offline
Tiger
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Santiago de Cuba, Cuba
Posts: 303
AMD and Apple

Hey guys:
I don't want to get into the old cpu comparisong Intel vs AMD, but recently i got in my hands my first AMD processor and install Archlinux (a linux lightweight distro) in it, and it seems to me that runs smoother than my previuos Intel installs.
So that brought to my mind a question:

Why Apple don't give support to AMD processors?

I read recently on Apple's Snow Leopard press release about the cooperation betwwen Apple Inc. and AMD in the brand new OpenCL standard which will be available onSnow Leopard, and, my point is why they don't expand the cooperation.

So what you all think about it?

CPU: Intel Pentium Dual E2140 1.6 GHz. Graphics: Intel(R) 82945G (128 MB). Board: Asus P5GC-TVM/S Chipset: Intel Lakeport-G i945GC. HDD: 232 Gb S-ATA Samsung
Version 10.6.2 32bit. Kernel: Vanilla. Audio: VoodooHDA 0.2.2 with prefpane. Video: Stock GMA. PS2 fix: VoodooPS2
USB 2 not working

Acer Aspire 4530-6823
CPU: AMD Athlon™ X2 QL-62 2.0GHz. Graphics: Integrated GeForce® 9100M G. Chipset: nForce® MCP77MH.

Last edited by erick2red; 06-17-2009 at 03:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-17-2009, 03:42 PM
uman uman is offline
Panther
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by erick2red View Post
Hey guys:
Why apple don't give support to AMD processors?
Business decision. Apple needs to ensure an adequate supply of processors. That's why even when they were PowerPC, they forced the supply issue from both Motorola and IBM. And given AMD's financials (now and when Apple made their switch), Intel was the logical choice. Moreover, Intel never would have agreed to any second-sourcing from AMD.

Given the iPhone trends (ARM, and custom Apple chips), a more likely choice maybe a move away from generic PC hardware. Which would sink the nascent OSx86 scene.

I think OSx86 on laptops is already doomed. Most of the new budget lappies use incompatible graphics cards (Intel 4500, or ATI Radeon 3200), and Apple has dropped the price of laptops.

If Apple didn't have such a blindspot towards cheaper, configurable desktops, then would there even be an OSx86 scene (I mean who can resist f*ing around with kexts, bootloaders, DSDT etc )

--
MacBook Pro - have allergy to nickel in the aluminum casing. So my kid gets an expensive toy!

Gateway MX 8738 - Retail, vanilla Snow Leopard 10.6.2 (thanks kizwan!) with Chameleon RC4, modified DSDT. Upgraded to Core 2 CPU (easy to do). Upgraded to 640GB drive. Everything but SD card working. Minor niggles. GMA950 with QE/CI and *no* artifacts.

iMac (luxo/lamp) G4 with Tiger.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-17-2009, 03:52 PM
erick2red's Avatar
erick2red erick2red is offline
Tiger
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Santiago de Cuba, Cuba
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally Posted by uman
Intel never would have agreed to any second-sourcing from AMD
I just can think this as a reason.



💡 Deploy cloud instances seamlessly on DigitalOcean. Free credits ($100) for InfMac readers.


CPU: Intel Pentium Dual E2140 1.6 GHz. Graphics: Intel(R) 82945G (128 MB). Board: Asus P5GC-TVM/S Chipset: Intel Lakeport-G i945GC. HDD: 232 Gb S-ATA Samsung
Version 10.6.2 32bit. Kernel: Vanilla. Audio: VoodooHDA 0.2.2 with prefpane. Video: Stock GMA. PS2 fix: VoodooPS2
USB 2 not working

Acer Aspire 4530-6823
CPU: AMD Athlon™ X2 QL-62 2.0GHz. Graphics: Integrated GeForce® 9100M G. Chipset: nForce® MCP77MH.
Reply With Quote
Reply