Legacy kernel 10.4.0 updated

[opiniatre]

Wow it does feel snappier compare to legacy 10.4.0 kernel.
Vmware not working for me too parallel is.
Great work ! thanks

[$The-King$]

when patching with amd ins patcher
it says bus error

[RayFlower]

Originally Posted by $The-King$ when patching with amd ins patcher it says bus error

Same here:S

[fumoboy007]

I tried using arch=x86_64 and -force64 together but it just won't boot into 64-bit mode, it always goes into 32-bit mode.

[andyvand]

Originally Posted by fumoboy007 I tried using arch=x86_64 and -force64 together but it just won't boot into 64-bit mode, it always goes into 32-bit mode.

I'll make (compile) a 32+64bit kernel soon

[$The-King$]

thanks andy
hope next one will be more featured and x86-64 compile work because i love to work with x86-64 kernel

[andyvand]

Originally Posted by $The-King$ when patching with amd ins patcher it says bus error

With v after the 2 binaries it works but I've made a V2.
This release also strips code signatures from the binaries it patches (even on universal binaries).

[eMatoS]

Andy, why is it that with the latest kernel I can't get chameleon to take the arch=x86_64 command? If I boot with Wait=Yes arch=x86_64 -force64 when Chameleon stops before the kernel loads it always says Loading i386 System or something similar, not X86_64. Maybe it's just cosmetic? Don't know. Perhaps you forced the loader to boot with the i386 command...

@Fumoboy007, don't pay attention to what System Profiler (and many other apps) says, you should check in activity monitor for 64bit apps.



Anyway, great work again Andy, the system's been very stable, it works better than in 32bit though I have to force some apps to run in 32bit but that's no big deal. Thank you...

[fumoboy007]

Originally Posted by eMatoS @Fumoboy007, don't pay attention to what System Profiler (and many other apps) says, you should check in activity monitor for 64bit apps.

But it seems to be loading 32-bit kexts though…so…iunno. In the kernel logs it says "64 bit mode enabled" but it also says "Darwin Kernel Version 10.4.0: vr 17 sep 2010 14:40:38 CEST; annappirtrvh v4 :xnu-1504.7.4-legacy/BUILD/obj/RELEASE_I386"…i386?

I'm using the binary that andy uploaded…maybe it wasn't compiled for 64-bit? hehe..just a thought.

[fumoboy007]

Originally Posted by fumoboy007 maybe it wasn't compiled for 64-bit?

WOAH…im actually right…i just did a "lipo -info" on that file and it's only i386!